Gelişmiş Arama

Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorDemirci, Sevil
dc.contributor.authorErtürk, Semih
dc.contributor.authorÜzel, Uğur
dc.date.accessioned2021-12-12T22:01:45Z
dc.date.available2021-12-12T22:01:45Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.issn2458-7494
dc.identifier.issn2458-7613
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.34186/klujes.626588
dc.identifier.urihttps://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/klujes/issue/51429/626588
dc.identifier.urihttps://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/913287
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11857/4250
dc.descriptionDergiPark: 626588en_US
dc.descriptionklujesen_US
dc.description.abstractSurfacequality behaviour was investigated for one step production system compared totraditional painting process. This study was conducted to compare and analysethe effect of one step production cycle on surface quality when compared withtraditional production system. Sample plates were prepared by traditionalpainting process with acrylic solvent based paint and one step production cyclewith polyurethane (PU) coating systems. Surface quality of plates were analysedregarding scratch resistance, thermal aging resistance and orange peelingformation. Test methods were determined according to Fiat painted plastic partqualification norms. Test results revealed that gloss loss, roughness valuesand orange peeling formation affinity were less for one step production systemwith PU than conventional system with solvent based acrylic paint. This studycontributes to revealing surface quality performance for the methods ofproducing painted parts that are more resistant to scratch, thermal conditionsand having much fewer surface defects like orange peeling.en_US
dc.description.abstractSurface quality behaviour was investigated for one step productionsystem compared to traditional painting process. This study was conducted tocompare and analyse the effect of one step production cycle on surface qualitywhen compared with traditional production system. Sample plates were preparedby traditional painting process with acrylic solvent based paint and one stepproduction cycle with polyurethane (PU) coating systems. Surface quality ofplates were analysed regarding scratch resistance, thermal aging resistance andorange peeling formation. Test methods were determined according to Fiatpainted plastic part qualification norms. Test results revealed that glossloss, roughness values and orange peeling formation affinity were less for onestep production system with PU than conventional system with solvent basedacrylic paint. This study contributes to revealing surface quality performancefor the methods of producing painted parts that are more resistant to scratch,thermal conditions and having much fewer surface defects like orange peeling.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherKırklareli Üniversitesien_US
dc.relation.ispartofKırklareli Üniversitesi Mühendislik ve Fen Bilimleri Dergisien_US
dc.identifier.doi10.34186/klujes.626588
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectSurface defects for painted partsen_US
dc.subjectSurface defects for painted partsen_US
dc.titleSURFACE QUALITY COMPARISON BETWEEN TRADITIONAL AND ONE STEP PRODUCTION CYCLEen_US
dc.typearticle
dc.department[KLÜ Yayınları]
dc.identifier.volume5en_US
dc.identifier.startpage210en_US
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.endpage221en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Ulusal Hakemli Dergi - Başka Kurum Yazarıen_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Thumbnail

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster